Recently Police departments across the country have begun using artificial intelligence (AI) Chatbots for writing incident reports. While this development is innovative, it raises serious questions about the integrity and effectiveness of these reports in legal contexts, especially in court.
The new The AI technology is developed by Axon, Creator of the Tasers and body cameras, and promises time savings and greater accuracy. However, there are concerns about the possibility Officials’ excessive reliance on AI raises questions.
According to Axon CEO Rick Smith: “They become police officers because they want to do police work, and spending half the day doing data entry is just a boring part of the job that they hate. … Well, there are certainly concerns. … You never want to put a police officer on the stand who says, well, “The AI wrote that, not me.”
New technology is being used for the first time in several locations across the country
The Oklahoma City Police Department is one of the companies currently testing chatbots to create initial drafts of incident reports.
Before testing the system in the city, the police showed it to local prosecutors, who were concerned about its use in serious criminal cases. Currently it is only used for reporting minor incidents.
In Lafayette, Indiana, Police Chief Scott Galloway said all of his officers Draft One in every type of case and that it is “incredibly popular”.
In Colorado Springs, CO.Police Sergeant Robert Younger pointed out that officers can use it for any type of report.
Possible risks
The The introduction of this technology was not without controversy. One of the biggest concerns is the accuracy and reliability of reports generated by AI. While AI can process large amounts of data quickly, its ability to interpret critical nuances and details in complex situations is still limited. This raises the question of whether these reports will hold up in court. where every word can be crucial.
Additionally, There is a risk that officials will become too dependent on AI, This could lead to a deterioration in the quality of police work. For example, an automated report might not fully capture the circumstances of an incident and omit details that a human officer might consider important. This could be particularly problematic if the defense challenges the accuracy of the report during a trial.
